Ukhrul: The Yang Raphei Longnao (YRL) on Tuesday submitted a memorandum to Deputy Commissioner of Ukhrul District for re-instatement of Free Movement Regime (FMR) and stoppage of the proposed construction of fencing along the artificial Indo-Myanmar border in the Naga ancestral domains.
The Yang Raphei Longnao consists of 10 border villages under Ukhrul district, Manipur, and has raised grave concern and strong objection to the scrapping of Free Movement Regime (FMR) and also to the proposed fencing of the artificial boundary between India and Myanmar.
Also read | Kom Naga Union Issues Strong Warning against KTC & KUM Over Historical Distortion
The memorandum stated that:
- Historical and Cultural Context
The Tangkhul Naga and other indigenous communities residing in these districts share deep historical, cultural, and familial ties with our brethren across the border in Myanmar. Border communities often belong to the same ethnic group and the FMR allow them to maintain familial, religious and social connection.These bonds predate the colonial demarcation of boundaries and are intrinsic to our identity, traditions, and way of life. - Threat to Peaceful Coexistence
Scraping the FMR could create tension between local conmunities on both sides of the border, disturbing the peace and harmony historically maintained in the region. - Violation of Indigenous People Right
The FMR allowed residents within 40 kilometers of the border to cross without requiring visas or passports. Scraping of FMR was completely distain to the people of the border villages, who are either citizens of India or the Union of Burma and who is ordinarily a resident within 40 kilometers. - Socio-Economic Dependence
Our livelihoods are significantly interwoven with cross-border interactions. The fencing would disrupt traditional trade routes, cultural exchanges, and access to ancestral lands, leading to division of brotherhood and socio-economic distress in the region - Arbitrary Demarcation
The present boundary line, drawn during colonial times without consultation with local communities, is seen as artificial and divisive. The fencing initiative would further entrench these divisions, alienating communities from their heritage and
resources.
Also Read | Search for Missing Man - Security Concerns
While we understand the government’s concerns regarding security, we believe that fencing is not a holistic solution. Strengthening dialogue, cooperation, and inclusive development programs can address these issues without compromising the well-being of the local populace. - Humanitarian Concerns
The border fence also raises humanitarian issues. It could exacerbate the plight of people who have been displaced or are living in border areas due to political or economic circumstances. The fencing would further isolate vulnerable populations and potentially lead to human rights violations.
Our Humble Demands:
Also read | First Hungpung SHG Federation Ginger Festival Celebrates Organic Farming and Livelihood
- Re-instate the Free Movement Regime encourage closer ties between nation, fostering trust, collaboration, peace and improving quality of life.
- Immediate suspension of the fencing project along the lndia-Myanmar boundary in Ukhrul district and Kamjong Area
- Initiation of a dialogue with local communities to address their concerns and expiore alternatives to fencing.
- Establishment of mechanisms to ensure that cross-border cultural and familial ties remain unhindered.
- Preservation of traditional rights over ancestral lands and resources that fall across the artificial boundary.
The memorandum then urged the government to respect the rights and dignity of the indigenous people and reconsider policies that threaten to disrupt their identity and existence. “We believe that a peaceful and inclusive approach will contribute to long-term harmony and prosperity for the region. We remain hopeful for your understanding and timely intervention in this matter,” it added.
Also Read | Global Naga Forum mourns the loss of visitor to Hornbill Festival
About The Author
