The controversy surrounding the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) examinations has once again returned to the spotlight as the defamation case against YouTuber and educator Nitish Rajput continues in a Delhi court.
Eduquity Technologies Pvt. Ltd., the agency responsible for conducting several SSC exams, has filed a ₹2.5 crore lawsuit alleging that Rajput’s investigative video contained false and damaging claims.
In the video, Rajput questioned the transparency of tender procedures and vendor appointments, citing RTI responses and official records to highlight what he described as serious administrative lapses.
Despite legal pressure, Rajput has refused to remove his content and maintains that his findings are based on verified documents and publicly available information. His stand has received strong backing from thousands of aspirants who have long complained about technical failures, delayed schedules, and mismanaged examination centers.
Also read | SSC Exam Chaos: How India’s Recruitment System Is Failing Its Youth
Through social media campaigns and online forums, supporters argue that the controversy reflects deeper systemic flaws in the recruitment process rather than an isolated dispute between a creator and a private company.
As the case remains pending, student groups and civil society organizations are increasingly urging judicial authorities to examine SSC’s functioning more closely.
Several aspirant associations are reportedly preparing petitions seeking Supreme Court intervention to ensure transparency in vendor selection and exam management.
With public trust in competitive examinations under strain, the outcome of this case is being closely watched, as it may shape future reforms and redefine accountability in India’s government recruitment system.
(Ukhrul Times has not altered the material in any manner. The content is published exactly as received from the original source.)