UKHRUL: The Global Naga Forum (GNF) has condemned the Nagaland Gaonburah Federation (NGBF) recent media release slamming MLA Achumbemo and said that NGBF cannot claim moral or historical authority to speak for the Naga people, especially since they are functionaries of the Indian government.
In a statement issued on Monday, GNF stated that the NGBF’s recent media release (Eastern Mirror, 16 April 2026, “NGBF slams MLA Achumbemo over ‘demeaning’ remarks on Gaonburahs”) reaffirmed its narrow vision of Nagas living in mutually exclusionary political entities in artificially separated territories, adding that the NGBF’s vision of a divided Naga people owes its origin to British colonial rule and its legacy in present-day India’s treatment of the Nagas, reflected in the ongoing impasse of the Indo-Naga political issue.
Also Read | GNF Expresses Concern Over IAF Mountain Radar System Installation in Nagaland
“Gaonburah institution was part of British colonial rule and system of control over the Nagas. It was handed on, against the expressed wishes of the Nagas, to the postcolonial nation-states of India and Burma. Today’s GB institution is a colonial legacy and functions as an administrative tool of the Indian government,’ GNF stated.
It asserted that Naga people live in their ancestral homelands but are separated in four Indian states and in Myanmar.
“The Naga political issue belongs to all the Nagas, not just to Nagas of any state or region. The NGBF’s function is limited within Nagaland state. It has the right to voice its opinion on the Naga political issue, but cannot claim moral or historical authority to speak for the Naga people, especially since they are functionaries of the Indian government, one of the parties of the peace negotiation. Nagaland GBs who are servants of the Indian government cannot legitimately claim to be “Custodians of traditional Naga authority”, it stated.
Also Read | GNF Urges Nagas to Unite Under ‘Pan Naga Hoho’
Stating that MLA Achumbemo Kikon has been a consistent defender of Naga human and political rights for decades, GNF said his conscientious advocacy in support of Naga peoplehood and for peaceful resolution of the Naga political issue does not transgress international law or the Indian constitution.
The Global Naga Forum further clarified that it was not a “rejection” of the contributions of Gaonburahs who have served their communities with sincerity. However, we are calling for a reform. Institutions that emerged under colonial conditions must be reexamined in the light of present realities and the aspirations of the Naga people, it stated.
It further reiterated that GNF is ideologically and practically committed to the peoplehood of the Nagas.
“We support the political and human rights of the Naga people as a whole and not just the rights of Nagas of a particular state. GNF’s commitment to Naga peoplehood prompts us to work with governments, civil society organizations, Naga Political Groups, political parties, and leaders who support Naga unity and advance the common good. We therefore find it most unfortunate that the Nagaland Gaonburah Federation has made it amply clear that its political commitment is limited to the Nagas of Nagaland state alone,” it stated.
Also Read | Drone Attacks on Naga Civilians: GNF Calls for Independent, Time-bound International Investigation
Extending its respect to those Gaonburahs who have served their people with sincerity, the GNF urged them to join in a process of introspection and reform, while adding that the future of the Naga people cannot be shaped by narrow positions or inherited administrative frameworks. “It must be built on a shared vision that reflects our history, our identity, and our collective political rights,” it stated.
“The institution of Gaonburah, having originated as a colonial construct and subsequently retained by the postcolonial state for administrative convenience, today presents several ambiguities in its roles and functions. There are evident inconsistencies in the application and understanding of the powers of Gaonburahs in both rural and urban contexts, particularly under Article 371A and the Nagaland Village and Area Council Act, 1978,” it further stated, while calling on on the Nagaland government to undertake a comprehensive review of the relevant legal provisions to bring clarity, consistency, and alignment with the present socio political realities of the Naga people.